🔗 Share this article

When Vladimir Putin traveled to India four years ago, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, curtailed by the global health crisis, focused on talks on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Months later, the full-scale invasion of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his overseas engagements.

Furthermore, that era preceded a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious statements and the imposition of heavy import duties.

"Against this backdrop, the importance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a defiance of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Both Nations

The summit occurs at a delicate moment. President Putin arrives following dismissing recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to reported gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this visit is its simple happening," stated a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It suggests a movement toward something resembling routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are particularly elevated. The country navigates a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats published a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a firm rebuke from Indian officials, who called it an unacceptable diplomatic practice.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The India-Russia bond dates back to the Cold War era and is firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's top defense supplier. This relationship was generally accepted by the West until a change in approach.

Over time, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. However, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, pressure mounted, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"In response, India has reverted to its default strategy of maintaining multiple options," noted a strategic analyst. "This demonstrates to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Beyond global diplomacy, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "China continues to be the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst stated.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, leading to efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its traditional ally.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, decreasing its dependence on Russian equipment from a dominant share to under 40% in the past few years.

"Delhi will try to strike a balance: purchase enough Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but not become overly reliant that a sudden cutoff would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

The Oil Question

Increased trade relations is expected to be a major topic. The Russian leader has publicly stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil purchases remains pivotal. While the Indian government has vowed to continue buying Russian oil, new sanctions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of American oil and gas.

A Russian official acknowledged "hurdles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would proceed uninterrupted. The official downplayed the effect of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "means" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the issue of Ukraine is likely to be addressed mainly through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, the nation does not possess the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the war," the analyst said. "Beyond encouraging talks, its ability to make a difference is constrained."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is fundamentally one of "pragmatic strategic interest," guided by national interest in a rapidly changing world.