🔗 Share this article

Government documents reveal that ministers enacted a ban on Palestine Action despite being given warnings that such measures could “unintentionally boost” the organization’s standing, according to leaked internal records.

Background

The briefing document was prepared a quarter before the legal outlawing of the group, which came into being to take direct action aimed at curb UK weapons exports to Israel.

This was written three months ago by staff at the department of home affairs and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, assisted by anti-terror policing experts.

Survey Findings

Beneath the subheading “What would be the proscription of the organisation be perceived by British people”, a segment of the briefing cautioned that a outlawing could become a polarizing topic.

Officials portrayed the network as a “small focused group with less general news coverage” compared to similar direct action movements like Just Stop Oil. However, it observed that the network’s activities, and arrests of its activists, had attracted press coverage.

Officials noted that surveys suggested “increasing discontent with Israeli military methods and actions in Gaza”.

In the lead-up to its main point, the document cited a survey indicating that 60% of the UK public believed Israel had gone too far in the hostilities in Gaza and that a like percentage backed a restriction on military sales.

“These constitute viewpoints based on which the organization builds its profile, acting purposefully to challenge the Israeli arms industry in the UK,” it said.

“Should that PAG is proscribed, their profile may inadvertently be enhanced, attracting sympathy among sympathetic members of the public who reject the British role in the Israeli arms industry.”

Other Risks

Officials said that the public disagreed with calls from the rightwing media for tough action, like a outlawing.

Other sections of the document cited research showing the citizens had a “general lack of awareness” about Palestine Action.

Officials wrote that “a significant segment of the British public are likely at this time ignorant of the group and would continue unaware in the event of a ban or, upon being told, would stay mostly unconcerned”.

The ban under terrorism laws has sparked protests where thousands have been detained for displaying signs in open spaces stating “I am against atrocities, I support the network”.

The document, which was a community impact assessment, noted that a proscription under terrorism laws could increase religious tensions and be seen as government bias in toward Israel.

The document cautioned officials and high-level staff that proscription could become “a catalyst for significant debate and objections”.

Recent Events

Huda Ammori of the network, said that the report’s predictions had proven accurate: “Understanding of the issues and support of the network have increased dramatically. This proscription has had the opposite effect.”

The interior minister at the point, Yvette Cooper, declared the ban in the summer, right after the group’s activists supposedly committed acts at RAF Brize Norton in the region. Officials claimed the destruction was substantial.

The schedule of the document demonstrates the ban was in development long prior to it was made public.

Officials were advised that a ban might be seen as an attack on individual rights, with the advisers stating that certain people in the cabinet as well as the wider public may consider the measure as “a creep of security authorities into the area of free expression and protest.”

Government Statements

A Home Office official said: “Palestine Action has conducted an growing wave entailing vandalism to Britain’s key installations, harassment, and reported assaults. Such behavior endangers the safety and security of the public at danger.

“Judgments on banning are carefully considered. Decisions are informed by a comprehensive evidence-based system, with assistance from a diverse set of advisers from multiple agencies, the police and the MI5.”

An anti-terror law enforcement representative commented: “Rulings relating to proscription are a responsibility for the government.

“In line with public expectations, national security forces, together with a variety of additional bodies, regularly supply information to the interior ministry to assist their efforts.”

This briefing also revealed that the Cabinet Office had been financing monthly polls of social friction related to the Middle East conflict.